Mixer aerator to save water

On the Internet I found a good advertisement about this aerator. I liked it, I ordered it. In fact, it is not very economical. Plastic thread is not eternal.

It looks beautiful, advertising is also attractive.

The product is plastic, the thread breaks.

Economically impractical! The cost of saved water does not overlap the cost of the aerator. It is much easier to use water economically. Conclusion: a divorce for money!

I do not see

solid

I bought it. I tried it. Noted time and a set of water in liters. Compared with the base aero rotor that comes with a conventional kitchen faucet. A set of water from the base aerator for the same time came out more profitable than advertised. With 30 liters, water savings of 5 liters. Ie advertised for the same time gave out 35 liters. Draw conclusions. Convenience is only in the ability to adjust the direction of water by turning the aerator head. It’s good that I didn’t buy two at once.

Convenience of regulation of the direction of water.

Price. Water overrun.

Before buying, I searched for reviews on the Internet and found nothing concrete, now when I use it myself I decided to leave a review. I use the fourth month, I felt the savings in the first month. Only the main thing is to understand that saving only happens when you wash your hands or dishes, if you want to get a kettle of water, you won’t save water, it’s just that the set time will increase slightly, but not significantly. Now I want to buy a shower head, a saving will be even more with it.

The water is soft, purified, it is very convenient to change the jet modes.

I think the price should be a little lower.

I was apparently not so lucky when buying an aerator to save water, as my review is negative. I decided to purchase an advertised ANGO aerator, and promised that up to 60% could save water.Believing the manufacturer and having read positive reviews on the Internet, I decided to purchase 2 aerators at once, in the sink and sink.

I use it at the moment for 3 months, but there is no sense. As winding up 3 cubes, and to this day so much is obtained per month. So, I can argue about the savings, nothing reminds of it here. In addition, buying an aerator is quite difficult, I had to specifically look for it in online stores and wait for the package, since nothing similar is sold in our stores. And the most offensive is that everything is in vain. My expectations were not met, the money wasted, there is no water saving, I do not recommend it.

Not

Doesn't help, a waste of money

Once on the Internet I came across an article about how, with the help of an aerator, for a mixer, you can save on water. I decided to buy it for myself, found an aerator in the Tescoma store, and bought it. This device is screwed onto the mixer, it is small in size. I installed it in the kitchen. Visually, I did not find a difference in the volumes of water supplied, but according to the counters, I can say that savings are occurring. The nozzle can rotate in a circle, while the water is not sprayed.

The main function of the aerator is to mix water with air, while making it softer. I did not see much savings, but it still happens by 20-30%. The installation is simple, I did everything myself, here even a child can cope without much difficulty. I bought rubles for four hundred, I think the thing is useful and necessary for all who have installed water meters. I will recommend it, the thing you need!

saves, easy installation, not expensive

in fact, the saving is not more than 20-30%

For the first time I saw a Tescoma aerator nozzle from a friend. Very fired up for her and the next day ran to the store for a nozzle. Here, by the way, it is necessary to understand that the aerator nozzle is screwed into the inside of the mixer itself, in exchange for the old-standard aerator. Therefore, if you have an old mixer installed, then this unit will not work for you. The aerator eliminates the uncontrolled flow of water and water hammer. For example, if earlier in minutes 1 liter of water was poured out of the tap, then now everything happens half as much, respectively, and water bills have become nicer. The housekeeper mixes water with air and converts the stream into streams, creating a small shower. Visually, even, it seems that there is more water, and in fact less water flows out.
I bought it for 1400 rubles, a little expensive, but I am completely satisfied with the quality, I advise.

saves water

not suitable for all faucets, dear

Aerator from the manufacturer Ferro, bought a few months ago. The thing is that counters are installed at home and, accordingly, you constantly think about how to save water. Seeing the aerator on the crane in the store, I decided to buy it right there. The cost is small, only 200 rubles.

It works according to the following principle: the water jet is filled with air, while becoming denser, due to the installed divider insert.
Threaded connection, it is standard for taps and mixers, grooves are mounted with a 22 key. The mesh of the liner is made of rubber. The flow of water from 100% becomes 50%, thanks to the divider, excellent water savings are obtained. For me, this divider has now become an integral part of the crane, and then it paid for itself in the first month of use. I recommend that it is much easier to monitor water and keep track of water consumption.

Water saving is good

Not sold everywhere